feat(algorithms, dynamic programming): coin change#162
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughRehomes Coin Change from puzzles to algorithms/dynamic_programming with three implementations and tests; refactors climb_stairs to expose explicit bottom-up and top-down DP functions and consolidates tests into parameterized suites. Legacy puzzles coin_change module, README, and tests were removed. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)(Skipped — changes do not introduce multi-component sequential flows that require visualization.) Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~45 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@algorithms/dynamic_programming/climb_stairs/__init__.py`:
- Around line 16-27: The bottom‑up function climb_stairs_dp_bottom_up can
IndexError for n <= 0; add an early input guard that mirrors the top‑down base
cases: if n <= 0 return 0, if n == 1 return 1 (and optionally if n == 2 return
2) before allocating dp, so subsequent dp[1]/dp[2] assignments are safe; update
climb_stairs_dp_bottom_up to validate n and return the correct base values.
In `@algorithms/dynamic_programming/coin_change/__init__.py`:
- Around line 10-41: The function find_minimum_coins incorrectly uses
range(total_change) so it never considers combinations of length total_change
and also calls min(coins) without handling an empty coins list; update logic in
find_minimum_coins to first check if coins is empty and raise a clear
ValueError, then iterate combination lengths from 1 up to and including
total_change (e.g., range(1, total_change + 1)) so solutions like
total_change=1, coins=[1] are tried; remove or stop relying on the unused result
variable and ensure the function still raises ValueError when no combination
sums to total_change.
In `@algorithms/dynamic_programming/coin_change/README.md`:
- Line 74: Change the heading text "Step by Step solution construction" to use
the compound modifier form "Step-by-step solution construction" by updating that
heading string in the README (the heading line currently reads Step by Step
solution construction).
In `@algorithms/dynamic_programming/coin_change/test_coin_change.py`:
- Around line 28-30: The test signature for test_find_minimum_coins incorrectly
types the expected parameter as int even though find_minimum_coins returns a
List[int]; update the type hint for the expected parameter in
test_find_minimum_coins from int to List[int] (ensure List is imported if
needed) so the test signature matches the actual return type of
find_minimum_coins.
In `@DIRECTORY.md`:
- Around line 60-61: The "Coin Change" list entry and its nested link "[Test
Coin
Change](https://github.com/BrianLusina/PythonSnips/blob/master/algorithms/dynamic_programming/coin_change/test_coin_change.py)"
are mis-indented; fix MD007 by adjusting the indentation to match the
repository's 2-space nesting convention so the parent bullet and its child link
align (e.g., ensure the nested link is indented two spaces under the "Coin
Change" bullet). Locate the "Coin Change" bullet and its nested link in
DIRECTORY.md and re-indent those lines to the correct 2-space nesting level.
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
algorithms/dynamic_programming/climb_stairs/__init__.py (1)
30-50: Add memoization so this is truly top‑down DP.Without caching, this is exponential and defeats the DP intent. Memoizing results makes it O(n).
♻️ Suggested fix (with caching)
+from functools import lru_cache + def climb_stairs(n: int) -> int: if n == 1: return 1 @@ -def climb_stairs_dp_top_down(n: int) -> int: +@lru_cache(maxsize=None) +def climb_stairs_dp_top_down(n: int) -> int:algorithms/dynamic_programming/climb_stairs/test_climb_stairs.py (1)
9-15: Replace the duplicate case with a base‑case check.
(4, 5)appears twice; swapping one for(1, 1)adds useful coverage without increasing test count.🧪 Suggested update
CLIMB_STAIRS_TEST_CASES = [ + (1, 1), (2, 2), (3, 3), (4, 5), - (4, 5), (5, 8), ]algorithms/dynamic_programming/coin_change/__init__.py (1)
77-98: Verify Python version forint | floattype union.
int | floatrequires Python 3.10+. If the repo supports older versions, useUnion[int, float].✅ Compatibility‑safe typing
-from typing import List +from typing import List, Union @@ - counter: List[int | float] = [float("inf")] * total + counter: List[Union[int, float]] = [float("inf")] * totalalgorithms/dynamic_programming/coin_change/test_coin_change.py (1)
10-23: Add a smallest‑nonzero test case.A
total_change=1case catches off‑by‑one errors in brute‑force search.🧪 Suggested test addition
FIND_MINIMUM_COINS_TEST_CASES = [ + (1, [1, 5, 10, 25, 100], [1]), (25, [1, 5, 10, 25, 100], [25]), (15, [1, 5, 10, 25, 100], [5, 10]),
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
fd1848f to
c80e003
Compare
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Describe your change:
Coin Change algorithm problem
Checklist:
Fixes: #{$ISSUE_NO}.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Tests
Chores / Reorganization
Documentation
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.